 
          130
        
        
          Portland
        
        
          
            Wednesday afternoon
          
        
        
          GE04:
        
        
          3:10-3:20 p.m.    Learning through Computation in Upper-
        
        
          Division Physics
        
        
          Contributed – David Roundy, Oregon State University, 301 Weniger Hall,
        
        
          Corvallis, OR 97331; 
        
        
        
          I will describe a computational laboratory course that I have developed
        
        
          to help students in learning upper-division courses. The course runs in
        
        
          parallel to their junior year courses, covering the same physics topics and
        
        
          many of the same mathematical methods. Students work in pairs, and write
        
        
          their programs with little guidance from the instructor. Results from less
        
        
          than two years of teaching this course suggest that students find it helpful,
        
        
          including students who join our program with no computer programming
        
        
          experience.
        
        
          GE05:
        
        
          3:20-3:30 p.m.    Of Cats and Students: Discovering
        
        
          Quantum Information with Undergraduates
        
        
          Contributed – Jean-Francois S. Van Huele, Brigham Young University, N151
        
        
          ESC, BYU, Provo, UT 84602-4681; 
        
        
        
          Can you violate the Heisenberg uncertainty relation? How do quantum op-
        
        
          erations work? What new insight does weak measurement provide? What
        
        
          restrictions exactly apply to cloning? When does entanglement come in
        
        
          handy? And what’s a quantum Cheshire cat? Quantum theory has evolved
        
        
          significantly beyond its traditional coverage in the physics curriculum.
        
        
          About all that we need to constrain quantum mysteries are linear algebra
        
        
          and creative thinking. This turns quantum information into fertile ground
        
        
          for undergraduate research projects and teaching. I review my experience
        
        
          with students and their projects and give examples on how to ask questions
        
        
          of current relevance in quantum theory and get the students to answer
        
        
          them.
        
        
          GE06:
        
        
          3:30-3:40 p.m.    Thermally Induced Structural Change
        
        
          Measured by Holographic Non-Destructive Testing
        
        
          Contributed – Ralph E. Oberly, Marshall University, One John Marshall Drive,
        
        
          Huntington, WV 25755; 
        
        
        
          Anthony Hernandez, Marshall University
        
        
          This project is to observe the structural change of a rigid body using
        
        
          holographic non-destructive testing. Through the application of a specific
        
        
          voltage to a Peltier heating and cooling device, it is possible to produce
        
        
          a controlled temperature change on the surface of the object. Using the
        
        
          technique of double-exposure, a hologram can be generated that shows an
        
        
          interference pattern between the shape of the original object at rest and
        
        
          its shape after some sort of physical deformation. The goal is to view the
        
        
          way that heat propagates through a three-dimensional object using this
        
        
          technique, and the object’s physical deformation over time with respect to
        
        
          controlled temperature change.
        
        
          GE07:
        
        
          3:40-3:50 p.m.    On-Ramp: Improving Students’
        
        
          Understanding of Lock-In Amplifiers*
        
        
          Contributed – Seth T. DeVore,** University of Pittsburgh, Department of Phys-
        
        
          ics and Astronomy,  Pittsburgh, PA 15213; 
        
        
        
          Chandralekha Singh, Jeremy Levy, University of Pittsburgh
        
        
          A lock-in amplifier is a powerful and versatile instrument frequently used
        
        
          in condensed matter physics research. However, many students struggle
        
        
          with the basics of a lock-in amplifier and they have difficulty in interpret-
        
        
          ing the data obtained with this device in diverse applications. To improve
        
        
          students’ understanding, we are developing an “On-Ramp” tutorial based
        
        
          on physics education research which makes use of a computer simulation
        
        
          of a lock-in amplifier. During the tutorial’s development we interviewed
        
        
          several faculty members and graduate students. The tutorial is based on a
        
        
          field-tested approach in which students realize their difficulties after pre-
        
        
          dicting the outcome of experiments that use a lock-in amplifier; students
        
        
          can check their predictions using simulations. The tutorial then guides
        
        
          students towards a coherent understanding of the basics of a lock-in ampli-
        
        
          fier. In this talk the development and assessment process will be discussed.
        
        
          *Supported by the National Science Foundation.
        
        
          **Sponsored by Chandralekha Singh
        
        
          GE08:
        
        
          3:50-4 p.m.    The Demographics and Experiences of
        
        
          Graduate Students in PER
        
        
          Contributed – Ramon Barthelemy, Western Michigan University, 1903 W.
        
        
          Michigan Ave., Kalamazoo, MI 49009;
        
        
        
          Charles Henderson, Western Michigan University
        
        
          Ben Van Dusen, University of Colorado Boulder
        
        
          Statistical data on the numbers, demographics, and experiences of graduate
        
        
          students in physics are well documented. However, in these assessments
        
        
          one sub-field is often left out, physics education research (PER). Currently
        
        
          no data exists on the composition of students in PER. This includes the
        
        
          number of graduate students, the departments they are housed in, their
        
        
          gender, their race, their experiences and more. This talk will present the
        
        
          first empirical study focusing on the experiences and demographics of
        
        
          students in PER.
        
        
          
            Session GF:  Lessons from Successful
          
        
        
          
            Professional Development for
          
        
        
          
            Successful Teacher Preparation
          
        
        
          Location:         Parlor A/B
        
        
          Sponsor:         Committee on Teacher Preparation
        
        
          Date:               Wednesday, July 17
        
        
          Time:               2:40–4:10 p.m.
        
        
          Presider: Karen Jo Matsler
        
        
          GF01:
        
        
          2:40-3:10 p.m.    AAPT/PTRA Professional Development
        
        
          for 4th-8th Grade Teachers*
        
        
          Invited – Steven L. Shropshire, Idaho State University, Department of Phys-
        
        
          ics, Pocatello, ID 83209;
        
        
        
          Jan Mader, Great Falls High School
        
        
          Karen Jo Matsler, Educational Assessment and Training, Inc.
        
        
          The Physics Teaching Resource Agents (PTRA) program developed by the
        
        
          AAPT has served as a successful professional development (PD) model
        
        
          for high school physics teachers since 1985. In Idaho, this model has been
        
        
          applied to PD for middle school teachers in physical science from 2008 to
        
        
          2011, and to PD for elementary teachers in physical science and mathemat-
        
        
          ics since 2011. Support from both programs has been provided by the
        
        
          Idaho Math Science Partnership. An overview of the AAPT/PTRA model
        
        
          for PD and how it was adjusted in Idaho to serve the needs of 4th-8th
        
        
          grade teachers will be presented. The impact of the program on teacher
        
        
          content knowledge and confidence, and on the academic performance of
        
        
          students of teachers who participated will be summarized.
        
        
          *This program is supported by the Idaho State Board of Education Math and Science
        
        
          Partnership program.
        
        
          GF02:
        
        
          3:10-3:40 p.m.    Lessons from GaDOE MSP and
        
        
          Improving Teacher Quality Professional Development
        
        
          Invited – Bob Powell, University of West Georgia, Department of Physics,
        
        
          Carrollton, GA 30118; 
        
        
        
          Ann Robinson, David Todd, University of West Georgia
        
        
          Sharon Kirby, Cherokee County Schools (retired)
        
        
          The University of West Georgia has been successful during the last six
        
        
          years in receiving grants to provide professional development for area
        
        
          teachers from both improving teacher quality and the Georgia Department
        
        
          of Education MSP programs. The key characteristics of the proposal prepa-
        
        
          ration are strong partnerships, justification for the need of professional
        
        
          development, letters of support, and meaningful content emphasizing
        
        
          hands-on activities. The AAPT/PTRA units on Kinematics and Dynam-
        
        
          ics, Energy and Momentum, Electricity and Magnetism, and Waves and
        
        
          Geometric Optics have been used for the curriculum and have been well
        
        
          received. Evaluations indicate improvement of both content knowledge
        
        
          and pedagogy skills.