97
          
        
        
          January 4–7, 2014
        
        
          
            Tuesday afternoon
          
        
        
          
            Poster Session 3A: Post Deadline
          
        
        
          
            Posters
          
        
        
          Location:        Grand Ballroom Foyer
        
        
          Sponsor:         AAPT
        
        
          Date:              Tuesday, January 7
        
        
          Time:              3–4:30 p.m.
        
        
          Persons with odd-numbered posters will present their posters from
        
        
          3–3:45 p.m.;  even-numbered will present 3:45–4:30 p.m.
        
        
          PST3A01:    3-3:45 p.m.   Meeting Common Core Standards in
        
        
          an Inquiry-based Physics Classroom
        
        
          Poster – Andrew S. Marth, Kutztown University, Fogelsville, PA 18051;
        
        
        
          Robert M. Adams, Kutztown University
        
        
          Today’s curriculum is currently driven by the common core stan-
        
        
          dards which have been adopted in most states. However, because the
        
        
          standards focus on reading and writing, it can be intimidating to try to
        
        
          implement them in an inquiry-based physics classroom. With the push
        
        
          towards discovery learning in science education, the goals of meeting
        
        
          the needs of students and applying common core standards, all while
        
        
          maintaining a student-centered classroom is challenging but not im-
        
        
          possible. By introducing varied reading strategies to the standard phys-
        
        
          ics curriculum, classroom teachers can successfully enhance students’
        
        
          reading skills while continuing to incorporate inquiry based teaching.
        
        
          This poster focuses on the study and implementation of successful
        
        
          reading and writing strategies that simultaneously meet core standards
        
        
          and enhance physics instruction.
        
        
          PST3A02:    3:45-4:30 p.m.   Inexpensive Nuclear Coincidence
        
        
          Experiments
        
        
          Poster – Patrick J. Polley, Beloit College, Beloit, WI 53511; polleyp@
        
        
          beloit.edu
        
        
          Sara Kasten, Elizabeth Kolbeck, Beloit College
        
        
          We describe a set of experiments involving nuclear coincidence
        
        
          events that we carried out using inexpensive filters, preamplifiers, and
        
        
          analog-to-digital convertors that we added to old Geiger counters. This
        
        
          additional circuitry allows us to monitor events that occur in conjunc-
        
        
          tion with other nuclear events. We present the results of our results for
        
        
          cosmic-ray detection and nuclear decays in 22Na and 137Cs, along with
        
        
          our circuit designs that can be used to refurbish older Geiger counters.
        
        
          PST3A03:    3-3:45 p.m.   Investigation of Bernoulli’s Equation
        
        
          in the Undergraduate Laboratory
        
        
          Poster – Patrick J. Polley, Beloit College, Beloit, WI 53511; polleyp@
        
        
          beloit.edu
        
        
          Richea Smith, Erik Binter, Beloit College
        
        
          Bernoulli’s equation is a statement of the conservation of energy for
        
        
          the flow of an incompressible fluid. In our work we apply Bernoulli’s
        
        
          equation to analyze the flow of water through a horizontal pipe attached
        
        
          to a two-liter bottle that acts as a reservoir. We expand our analysis by
        
        
          examining the loss of kinetic energy that results from viscosity for dif-
        
        
          ferent diameters and lengths of pipe. We present our work in the format
        
        
          of a laboratory exercise that requires minimal equipment and can be
        
        
          performed in the introductory physics laboratory
        
        
          PST3A04:    3:45-4:30 p.m.   Teacher and Student Ideas on
        
        
          Electronics Laboratories
        
        
          Poster – Pieter TJD Coppens, KU Leuven Celestijnenlaan 200C, bus
        
        
          2406 Heverlee, 3001 Belgium; 
        
        
        
          Mieke De Cock, KU Leuven
        
        
          Although a significant amount of time is dedicated to lab work in a
        
        
          typical engineering curriculum, the aim of it is not always clear. There-
        
        
          fore, we constructed a survey about laboratory goals that was filled in
        
        
          by over 300 students and teachers of a second-year electronics course
        
        
          at four Belgian university colleges. Results show a difference between
        
        
          teachers’ and students’ expectations about laboratories, as well as a
        
        
          remarkable agreement between colleges. This poster will present the
        
        
          data along with an analysis and discussion.
        
        
          PST3A05:    3-3:45 p.m.   SN 2009nr Image Reduction and
        
        
          Analysis
        
        
          Poster – Jonathan J. Heath, Francis Marion University, Florence, SC
        
        
          29501;
        
        
        
          Ginger Bryngelson, Francis Marion University
        
        
          A type Ia supernova (SN Ia) is a white dwarf (WD) [a dense, electron-
        
        
          degenerate vestige of a star] that has appropriated enough mass from a
        
        
          neighboring star that the total mass of the WD reaches a critical point.
        
        
          The star quickly approaches its mass limit (Chandrasekhar limit) until
        
        
          the overall heat and pressure results in a thermonuclear explosion. A
        
        
          plot of this object’s brightness over time is known as a light curve. Be-
        
        
          cause of the uniformity of their light curves, SNe Ia are valuable mark-
        
        
          ers for determining the expansion of the universe and other cosmologi-
        
        
          cal parameters. Understanding the properties of these supernovae is
        
        
          vital in order to build our confidence in their use as standard candles.
        
        
          A small, but increasing number of SN Ia late-time observations have
        
        
          been made in the near-infrared (NIR). Most exhibit a flattening of the
        
        
          NIR power even as the visible light declines at a steady rate. It is still
        
        
          unclear as to why they exhibit this behavior and how typical this is. In
        
        
          order to characterize the late behavior of SNe Ia, images of the super-
        
        
          nova 2009nr were analyzed using the Image Reduction and Analysis
        
        
          Facility (IRAF). NIR (J, H, K) images were taken with the 4m Mayall
        
        
          Telescope at Kitt Peak National-Observatory using the FLAMINGOS
        
        
          IR Imaging Spectrometer while optical (B, V, R, I) images used the
        
        
          Mosaic 1 imager. The supernova’s apparent magnitude for each night of
        
        
          observation (by filter) was found by using reference stars. We present
        
        
          preliminary light curves of the supernova 2009nr and a comparison to
        
        
          another SN Ia observed at similar epochs.
        
        
          PST3A06:    3:45-4:30 p.m.   Investigation into How to Evaluate
        
        
          Students’ Lab Work
        
        
          Poster – Dan Liu, University of New Haven, West Haven, CT 06516-
        
        
          1999; 
        
        
        
          Whether group lab report assignments can engage students more than
        
        
          individual lab report assignments? Do you give students a final exam
        
        
          in lab sessions? What percentage of the final test should be given? A
        
        
          pool of 90 undergraduate students in five different lab sessions at the
        
        
          University of New Haven completed the survey of their preference.
        
        
          They are from freshman to junior, with different majors. The result of
        
        
          the investigation provides a reference for lab lecturers to set syllabus
        
        
          and rubrics.
        
        
          PST3A07:    3-3:45 p.m.   Using Interdisciplinary Projects in
        
        
          General Physics Courses
        
        
          Poster – Mojgan Matloob Haghanikar, Towson University, Department of
        
        
          Physics, Towson, MD 21204; 
        
        
        
          To promote transfer of learning, the introductory physics students at
        
        
          several universities were encouraged to get involved in projects that
        
        
          were about application of physics concepts to their major of study. We
        
        
          were seeking to improve students’ understanding of physics concepts
        
        
          by enhancing their empirical understanding and facilitating the
        
        
          visualization of abstract concepts. Thinking across disciplines informed
        
        
          students about many applications of physics and improved students’
        
        
          beliefs about relevancy of physics. In addition, integrating several per-
        
        
          spectives and learning approaches provided more accessibility in phys-
        
        
          ics. We encouraged group presentations, and students who contributed
        
        
          to the projects were rewarded based on their efforts. At the end of pre-
        
        
          sentation day, students were introduced to many applications of physics
        
        
          through their own research and listening to the research of their peers.
        
        
          Among the example topics were muscle activities and action potentials,
        
        
          electrophoresis of DNA, Micelle formations, polarization angle of car-
        
        
          bon fibers in electric fields, RNA replications and electrostatic forces,
        
        
          using center of mass in architecture to prevent earthquake destruction
        
        
          and using fiber optic in architecture lightening design. In this poster we
        
        
          present a few examples of the students’ findings.
        
        
          PST3A08:    3:45-4:30 p.m.   Outcome of Learning Physics with
        
        
          Mathematics
        
        
          Poster – Sunil Dehipawala, Queensborough Community College, Bay-
        
        
          side, NY 11364; 
        
        
        
          Vazgen Shekoyan, Haishen Yao, Queensborough Community College