128
        
        
          
            Wednesday morning
          
        
        
          FD03:
        
        
          8:50-9 a.m.   Integrating Practices and Core Ideas into
        
        
          Introductory Physics Courses
        
        
          Contributed – James T. Laverty, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
        
        
          48824; 
        
        
        
          The current curriculum in most introductory college physics classes
        
        
          nationwide centers almost exclusively on content knowledge. Many recent
        
        
          national publications have called for an integration of scientific practices
        
        
          (e.g. Construct and Use Models) into the curriculum to teach students
        
        
          the process of science as well. In the Physics and Astronomy Department
        
        
          at Michigan State University, we are working with faculty to incorporate
        
        
          practices into the introductory physics courses. As part of this process, we
        
        
          are developing assessment items that integrate both the practices and core
        
        
          ideas of introductory physics. These items are being used as a stepping
        
        
          stone to develop curricular changes in the courses as well. This talk will
        
        
          focus on this development process and its current status.
        
        
          FD04:
        
        
          9-9:10 a.m.   Project-based Learning to Foster Students’
        
        
          Learning in Introductory Physics
        
        
          Contributed – N. Sanjay Rebello, Kansas State University, Department of
        
        
          Physics, Manhattan, KS 66506; 
        
        
        
          Dong-Hai Nguyen, Ho Chi Minh City University of Pedagogy
        
        
          Thanh-Nga Nguyen, Vietnam University of Transportation
        
        
          Huong-Tra Do, Hanoi University of Education
        
        
          Project-based learning (PBL) is a model of teaching in which students learn
        
        
          new knowledge and gain new skills by conducting learning projects that are
        
        
          closely related to their career or to real life. This model has proved to have
        
        
          positive effects in fostering students’ self-motivation, activeness, and creativ-
        
        
          ity in learning; as well as in helping students relate classroom knowledge to
        
        
          real life. At the University of Transportation (Vietnam) we conducted a study
        
        
          in which 200 first-year students majoring in transportation engineering took
        
        
          a course in calculus-based introductory physics in PBL format. Students
        
        
          worked in groups of three or four on several projects related to their major.
        
        
          We found that these students not only gained new physics knowledge and
        
        
          team-work skills but also became more capable of applying those knowledge
        
        
          and skills to real-life projects related to their major.
        
        
          FD05:
        
        
          9:10-9:20 a.m.   Adapting Upside-down Pedagogies for a
        
        
          Hybrid Introductory Mechanics Studio
        
        
          Contributed – Kristine E. Callan, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO
        
        
          80401-1843; 
        
        
        
          Alex Flournoy, Vince Kuo, Colorado School of Mines
        
        
          At Colorado School of Mines, the calculus-based introductory mechanics
        
        
          course has been taught using a hybrid lecture/studio model since 1997.
        
        
          As part of our continued efforts to refine the course, we have recently
        
        
          changed our pedagogy in an effort to further increase the level of interac-
        
        
          tive engagement and make the course more streamlined and coherent. In
        
        
          this current implementation, each topic is covered through a sequence
        
        
          of: 1) concise pre-lecture readings—written in-house; 2) a 50-minute
        
        
          lecture where concept questions and problem-solving examples are used
        
        
          to model application— i.e., no content delivery; 3) a 110-minute studio
        
        
          session where students collaborate in groups of three on experiments and
        
        
          scaffolded problem solving tasks; and 4) a series of example and home-
        
        
          work problems—mostly written in-house. We will present data from two
        
        
          semesters of this pilot study, with ~1000 students taking the course during
        
        
          this time span.
        
        
          FD06:
        
        
          9:20-9:30 a.m.   A Modern Physics Course Featuring
        
        
          Theory, Computation, and Experimentation*
        
        
          Contributed – Marie Lopez del Puerto, University of St. Thomas, 2115 Sum-
        
        
          mit Ave., OWS 153, St. Paul, MN 55105; 
        
        
        
          The transition from lower-level to upper-level physics courses is difficult
        
        
          for many students as the course material becomes more abstract and the
        
        
          mathematics more sophisticated. At the same time, students need com-
        
        
          putational skills such as plotting, fitting data, and modeling, as problems
        
        
          become more complex. We describe the development of a sophomore-level
        
        
          “Applications of Modern Physics” course that bridges the lower-level and
        
        
          upper-level curriculum for electrical engineering and physics students. The
        
        
          laboratory for the course is closely tied to the class and illustrates complex
        
        
          concepts such as quantized energy levels and probabilities in classical and
        
        
          quantum physics, following the theme of “particles in a box.” Laborato-
        
        
          ries consist of tutorials using simulations, computational modeling using
        
        
          MATLAB, and brief, illustrative experiments. Thus, the course features the
        
        
          interplay between theory, computation, and experimentation that is central
        
        
          to the advancement of scientific knowledge.
        
        
          *Laboratory and curriculum development for this “Applications of Modern Physics”
        
        
          course has been supported by the physics department and a grant from the Faculty
        
        
          Development Center at the University of St. Thomas, as well as NSF-TUES grant
        
        
          DUE-1140034, and MathWorks software and curriculum development grants.
        
        
          FD07:
        
        
          9:30-9:40 a.m.   How “First Day” Activities in Physics
        
        
          Courses Generate Student Buy-In
        
        
          Contributed – Jon D. H. Gaffney, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY
        
        
          40475;
        
        
        
          Jacob T. Whitaker, Eastern Kentucky University
        
        
          The first day of class sets the stage for the rest of the semester by setting
        
        
          expectations for the course. It is especially important to set those expecta-
        
        
          tions in an active learning physics course because they are often quite
        
        
          different than expectations students have upon entering the course. Some
        
        
          faculty members have created activities specifically intended to generate
        
        
          such shifts, but whether those activities succeed in generating student
        
        
          buy-in may largely depend on how the activities are conducted. In this talk,
        
        
          we will present a hypothesis based on two existing theoretical constructs:
        
        
          instructor credibility and face threat mitigation. Together, those ideas de-
        
        
          scribe one way that first day activities help generate a favorable classroom
        
        
          climate. We will discuss one activity that is used in the Physics for Teachers
        
        
          course at Eastern Kentucky University in terms of those constructs to
        
        
          demonstrate the plausibility of our hypothesis.
        
        
          FD08:
        
        
          9:40-9:50 a.m.    C3PO: Customizable Computer Coaches
        
        
          for Physics Online
        
        
          Contributed – K. Heller, University of Minnesota, School of Physics and
        
        
          Astronomy, Minneapolis, MN 55455; 
        
        
        
          E. Frodermann, L. Hsu, Q. Ryan, University of Minnesota
        
        
          B. Aryal, University of Minnesota-Rochester
        
        
          Problem solving plays a crucial role in introductory physics. However,
        
        
          most introductory physics students are not skilled enough in problem solv-
        
        
          ing to use it effectively as a learning tool. These students need coaching to
        
        
          improve their problem solving skills as they learn physics. Computers are a
        
        
          potential tool to provide this coaching since they are patient, non-threaten-
        
        
          ing, and available 24/7 over the Internet. This talk will briefly describe such
        
        
          coaches and their success in the first semester of large calculus-based phys-
        
        
          ics at the University of Minnesota. It will also describe the next generation
        
        
          of computer coaches that are designed to be easily modified by instructors.
        
        
          Important contributions to this presentation by: K. Crouse, E. Hoover, J.
        
        
          Yang (U. Minnesota), J. Docktor (U. Wisconsin, La Crosse), K. A. Jackson
        
        
          (U. Central Michigan) , and A. Mason (U.Central Arkansas). This work
        
        
          was partially supported by NSF DUE-0715615 & 1226197.
        
        
          FD09:
        
        
          9:50-10 a.m.   Implementation of Web-based Problem
        
        
          Solving Computer Coaches in Classroom
        
        
          Contributed – Bijaya Aryal, University of Minnesota-Rochester, 300 University
        
        
          Square, 111 S Broadway, Rochester, MN 55904; 
        
        
        
          This presentation describes the integration of web-based computer coaches
        
        
          into small classes at University of Minnesota Rochester. Implementations
        
        
          have included students using the coaches outside of class as part of home-
        
        
          work as well as the use of coaches as part of small group work inside the
        
        
          classroom. I will present the challenges faced by students and instructor
        
        
          both inside and outside the classroom, and describe the nature of students’
        
        
          group dynamics when they used the coaches to facilitate group work.
        
        
          In addition, I will discuss the impact of the coaches on students’ course
        
        
          performance and how in-class use of the coaches affected their subsequent
        
        
          usage outside class.