80
          
        
        
          to not only published data but also my own experimental data.
        
        
          2
        
        
          1. Block, Patricia JW. “Noise response of cavities of varying dimensions at
        
        
          subsonic speeds.” (1976).
        
        
          *Sponsored by Wolfgang Christian
        
        
          
            Lecture/Classroom
          
        
        
          PST2E01:   8:30-9:15 p.m.    Whiteboarding in Conceptual
        
        
          Physics: Evidence From a First Year Experience*
        
        
          Poster – Bradley F. Gearhart, Buffalo Public Schools, 830 Union Rd.,
        
        
          West Seneca, NY 14224;
        
        
        
          John Bihr, Buffalo Public Schools
        
        
          Dan MacIsaac, Buffalo State College
        
        
          During the 2012-2013 school year, Riverside High School, a per-
        
        
          sistently low achieving school in the Buffalo Public School District
        
        
          (Buffalo, NY), launched their first offering of Conceptual Physics to
        
        
          support the a new Health Science Academy within the school. Two
        
        
          teachers integrated whiteboarding into three sections of Conceptual
        
        
          Physics. Despite chronic absenteeism, high levels of initial student
        
        
          apathy, a preponderance of ESL students, and extraordinarily diverse
        
        
          student demographics, whiteboards demonstrated profound levels of
        
        
          student thinking and highly varied interpretations of shared evidence
        
        
          not typically associated with students in low performing urban
        
        
          schools. Evidence gathered from student whiteboards demonstrated
        
        
          cognitive interaction beyond that typically reflected on high stakes
        
        
          standardized testing for this student population.
        
        
          *This project was supported by Buffalo State College, and the National Science
        
        
          Foundation (NSF) funded Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Partner-
        
        
          ship (ISEP) MSP project.
        
        
          PST2E02:    9:15-10 p.m.   Teaching Physics Using a Public
        
        
          Policy Framework
        
        
          Poster – Jennifer K. Perrella,* Cesar Chavez Public Charter Schools
        
        
          for Public Policy, 3701 Hayes St. NE, Washington, DC 20019 jennifer.
        
        
        
          Incorporating topics of interest to the general public into a physics
        
        
          course can be a daunting challenge. Yet doing so successfully can
        
        
          not only increase understanding of physics concepts as they apply in
        
        
          everyday life, but also can serve as a way to engage students who his-
        
        
          torically struggle in STEM classes. With the nationwide shift to Com-
        
        
          mon Core standards and a resulting emphasis on literacy and critical
        
        
          thinking in all disciplines, public policy issues act as a structure upon
        
        
          which to build a physics class that incorporates these changes. A
        
        
          variety of performance tasks centered on policy issues such as helmet
        
        
          laws, wind turbine designs, and radio frequency identification can be
        
        
          used to assess student understanding of both the concepts and cal-
        
        
          culations of a physics course. This approach also aligns with the Next
        
        
          Generation Science Standards.
        
        
          *Sponsored by Kim Quire
        
        
          PST2E03:   8:30-9:15 p.m.   The Academic Equity and Ethics
        
        
          Survey
        
        
          Poster – Frances Ann Mateycik, Penn State Altoona, 3000 Ivyside Dr.,
        
        
          Altoona, PA 16601;
        
        
        
          As a result of witnessing open disregard to the academic honor code
        
        
          every semester, I was determined to find out why these few students
        
        
          felt it was appropriate to cheat on individual assessments. Through
        
        
          general discussion it was clear that these students never intended on
        
        
          hiding their actions, but rather, defended their cheating using their
        
        
          own resolved code of academic conduct. These students felt that it
        
        
          was their right as learners to provide themselves with the best educa-
        
        
          tion, and if they were learning something new while discussing an
        
        
          examination problem, then it was not a dishonorable act. Discussion
        
        
          with these students were used to draft an “academic equity and ethics”
        
        
          survey. The survey was presented to my physics students at the start of
        
        
          every semester, for three consecutive semesters, totaling approximate-
        
        
          ly 200 students. This poster will present the survey questions posed,
        
        
          and the trends in answers given on the survey.
        
        
          PST2E04:   9:15-10 p.m.    Problem-solving Strategies and
        
        
          Tracker to Build Dynamical Models
        
        
          Poster – Norely Useche-Baron, IED Leonardo Posada Pedraza, Bogota,
        
        
          00000 Colombia;
        
        
        
          Fabian Martinez-Velandia, Gimnasio La Montaña
        
        
          We use the problem-solving strategies proposed by Knight and others
        
        
          in their book
        
        
          College Physics
        
        
          , to give the tools that students need to
        
        
          build dynamic models in a video analysis tool, in this case Tracker.
        
        
          Taking into consideration different situations, we develop a workshop
        
        
          series that allows the students build the free-diagram body. Through
        
        
          this diagram, they can build dynamic models that can be used in
        
        
          Tracker to run a simulation, and compare the latter with a situation
        
        
          showed in video.
        
        
          PST2E05:    8:30-9:15 p.m.   Responsive Teaching: A
        
        
          Practitioner’s View
        
        
          Poster – Sharon G. Fargason,* Fay Elementary School, San Diego, CA
        
        
          92105;
        
        
        
          Responsive teaching offers students the opportunity to learn science
        
        
          in the spirit of the discipline itself. Students work together to explain,
        
        
          question, model, test, and evaluate their own ideas, rather than
        
        
          follow a prescribed set of directions or recipes for experiments. The
        
        
          curriculum evolves on the basis of the ideas that students bring up,
        
        
          and the role of the teacher is to recognize, draw out, and build on the
        
        
          nascent scientific ideas that students offer. Data from my third grade
        
        
          classroom will highlight what responsive teaching is, how teacher
        
        
          pedagogy and planning are affected, and the ways that students de-
        
        
          velop skills and routines that are critical to the discipline of science.
        
        
          *Sponsor: Amy Robertson
        
        
          Exhibit Hall Raffles
        
        
          Sunday and Monday
        
        
          Kindle
        
        
          Amazon Gift Card
        
        
          (Must be present to win)
        
        
          Grand Ballroom A
        
        
          Purchase $1 tickets at
        
        
          Registration!
        
        
          
            Monday afternoon